Brian Hume

Your AI initiative will fail without architecture that survives contact with reality.

Fractional CTO and AI Systems Architect for Series A-C companies. Senior judgment without the six-month search, the equity hit, or the $500K bet on someone unproven. Stop guessing your roadmap and start hitting your ship dates.

In the first 60 days: audit your architecture, identify the decisions creating the most risk, and ship the thing that has been stuck.

The Reality

What I see when I audit most AI initiatives

  • Proof-of-concepts that never reach production because no one planned for scale.

  • Vector databases implemented before understanding the problem they are meant to solve.

  • Expensive senior talent writing throwaway code because the architecture is undefined.

  • No documentation. No exit strategy. No architectural decision records.

  • Technical debt compounding faster than feature velocity.

  • Founders who cannot explain their own technical roadmap to investors.

Principles

How I think about technical leadership

01

Architecture is risk management

Every technical decision is a bet on the future. I make those bets explicit, documented, and reversible. The goal is not perfect architecture. The goal is knowing exactly what you are trading off and why.

02

AI is a capability, not a product

The goal is never "use AI." The goal is solve problems profitably. If a regex solves it better than a transformer, you use the regex. I have no allegiance to technology. Only outcomes.

03

Complexity is a liability

Every line of code is a future maintenance burden. Every microservice is another failure mode. Every dependency is a supply chain risk. I optimize for deletion. Ship less, ship better.

04

Documentation is product

If it is not written down, it does not exist. Architecture decisions fade from memory. Context evaporates when people leave. I document for the future developer who will curse your name. That developer is you, six months from now.

Fit

This works when there is mutual alignment

You are

  • A founder or CEO who knows you need senior technical leadership but cannot justify a $500K+ hire.
  • Building a product that already has users or revenue. This is not for pre-idea stage.
  • Willing to pay premium rates for premium outcomes. Cheap is expensive in technology.
  • Ready to be challenged on your assumptions. I am not here to nod along.
  • Looking for strategic ownership, not task execution. I manage myself.

You are not

  • Looking for the cheapest option. There are offshore agencies for that.
  • Expecting 24/7 availability or instant Slack responses. I work with multiple clients.
  • Wanting someone to just build your feature backlog without questioning it.
  • In "idea stage" without users, revenue, or a functional prototype.
  • Convinced your tech stack choice is perfect and unchallengeable.

The Model

Why fractional leadership works

Most Series A-C companies do not need a full-time CTO. They need senior strategic leadership without the $500K+ commitment. Here is how fractional compares.

Full-time CTO

  • $400-600K+ fully loaded cost
  • 6+ month search and onboarding
  • Locked into one perspective
  • Equity expectations and long-term commitment

Freelance developer

  • No strategic ownership or accountability
  • Context lost between projects
  • You manage them, not the other way around
  • Incentivized to bill hours, not solve problems

Fractional CTO

  • Senior leadership at a fraction of the cost
  • Diverse pattern recognition from multiple companies
  • I manage myself and own outcomes
  • Flexible engagement scales with your needs

Engagement

Three ways to work together

Architecture Audit

A clear picture

Two focused sessions to identify what is broken, what is risky, and what needs to change.

$4,000Two sessions

Includes:

  • Session 1: Discovery call to understand current state and pain points
  • Session 2: Findings presentation with prioritized recommendations
  • Architecture Decision Record documenting key findings
  • Written report on immediate risks and quick wins

Advisory Retainer

Ongoing counsel

Monthly strategic hours for architecture reviews, hiring decisions, vendor evaluation, and technical roadmap planning.

$6,000/monthMonthly

Includes:

  • 8-10 hours of strategic consulting per month
  • Async access via Slack or email for quick questions
  • Architecture review and technical roadmap input
  • Hiring and vendor evaluation support
  • Attendance at key technical meetings (optional)

Fractional Lead

Embedded leadership

Part-time integration into your team. I run technical strategy, lead engineering, and own outcomes.

Inquire1-2 days/week

Includes:

  • Strategic ownership of technical roadmap
  • Team leadership and sprint participation
  • Architecture decision-making authority
  • Hiring, onboarding, and performance management
  • Investor and board communication support

Manifesto

How I think

I have spent two decades building systems that survive contact with users. I have seen the same mistakes repeated in different languages, different frameworks, different companies. The technology changes. The mistakes do not.

Most technical problems are not technical. They are organizational, cultural, or incentive problems disguised as technical ones. You cannot engineer your way out of a bad product strategy. You cannot microservice your way out of unclear requirements. You cannot AI your way out of fundamental process dysfunction.

I am not impressed by your tech stack. I am impressed by your ability to ship. I care about uptime, not uptimes. I care about whether your architecture fits your constraints, not whether it fits a blog post from 2018.

Code is a liability until it is shipping value. Every line you write is a future maintenance burden. Every abstraction is a bet that the future will look like you think it will. Most of those bets lose. The job is not to write clever code. The job is to write boring, deletable, understandable code that solves a real problem.

I have no patience for resume-driven development, architecture astronauts, or technology for technology's sake. If you want someone to validate your Kubernetes cluster for a three-person startup, hire someone else. If you want someone to tell you the truth about what you need, when you need it, and why it matters—you are in the right place.

I optimize for outcomes, not outputs. For clarity, not complexity. For momentum, not perfection. If that sounds like what you need, let us talk.

Let us find out if we are a fit.

I take on 2-3 clients at a time. A 30-minute call will establish whether this makes sense for both of us.

No pitch. No pressure. Just a conversation.